THE East Antarctic ice sheet looks unlikely to release its frozen grip any time soon. A new model suggests that prehistoric sea-level rise long thought to have been caused by the ice sheet melting was actually the result of local subsidence.
About 400,000 years ago, Earth went through a warm interglacial period similar to today's. The geological record shows traces of beaches and marine fossils in areas of Bermuda and the Bahamas far from the coast, suggesting that sea level was 20 metres higher than now.
Global sea level could have been that high only if the East Antarctic ice sheet melted at the time, according to climate models. And that is odd: this ice sheet doesn't seem to have melted at any other point in its long history.
Others have looked for more exotic explanations - for instance, that a mega tsunami hit Bermuda and the Bahamas and formed the confounding shoreline.
Maureen Raymo of Columbia University in Palisades, New York, thinks there is a simpler explanation. Ice sheets are heavy and weigh down the crust, while the ice-free areas just beyond the sheet bulge upwards as a consequence. When the ice melts, the crust beneath the former sheet rebounds, but the crust in the peripheral bulge subsides, making the land there dip and sea-level rise appear more extreme.
Bermuda and the Bahamas lie where the peripheral bulge of the North American ice sheet would have been 400,000 years ago. When Raymo and colleagues corrected the climate model to include Earth's elastic response to losing a heavy ice sheet, it added the missing metres to the lower sea level calculated for the Caribbean at the time. It means that the apparently extreme sea-level rise was only a local phenomenon (Nature, DOI: 10.1038/nature10891).
The results, Raymo says, mean "it is extremely unlikely the East Antarctic ice sheet can melt catastrophically in a slightly warmer climate".
"Putting constraints on how much sea levels rose is very important as we evaluate climate models [coupled with] ice sheet models," says Bette Otto-Bliesner of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado.
Stefan Rahmstorf at Potsdam University in Germany had thought that sea levels may at one time have been 20 metres higher all around the world. "The data were rather puzzling - now it all makes much more sense," he says. Raymo notes: "Saying that sea level isn't going up 20 metres does not mean that it only going up 10 metres is a good thing."
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
weather houston small business saturday small business saturday hank baskett beyonce dance for you beyonce dance for you nba lockout over
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar